Share to:

The Most Affordable Methods

The size, type of building, location, and cost of materials and labor impact the cost of building a school, but school districts have little or limited influence over many of these factors. To save money, responsible school districts are ensuring efficient and affordable construction through modular construction, value engineering, repurposing existing buildings, and design-build approach

Modular Construction

This modular construction method involves fabricating building components off-site and then assembling them on-site. 

Pros

  • Reduced construction time by fabricating components off-site
  • Reduce costs of on-site material storage and weather delays
  • Higher quality and consistency by fabricating in a controlled environment
  • Reduce overall waste

Cons

  • Limited design options
  • Potential zoning restrictions
  • Difficulty transporting the assembled components to the construction site 
  • Higher initial investment (long term savings)

Value Engineering

Value engineering involves a team of experts and stakeholders evaluating a project’s design, materials, and construction methods to identify opportunities for improvement and cost savings while maintaining or improving the desired quality and functionality of the project.

Pros

  • Reduced cost while maintaining desired quality and functionality
  • Lead to improvements in design, materials, and construction methods
  • Increased efficiency and reduced construction time
  • Better understanding of project needs

Cons

  • Time consuming process that can delay the construction start
  • Cost of conducting the value engineering analysis can be significant on large projects
  • Risk of compromise can result in less than desired quality and functionality

Repurposing Existing Buildings

Instead of building a new school from scratch, a district may choose to repurpose an existing building, such as a former office building or factory.

Pros

  • Saving on costs of land acquisition and new construction
  • Environmentally friendly by reducing waste and conserve resources
  • Historical preservation
  • Quicker completion time by not doing site preparation and new construction

Cons

  • Limited design options and flexibility for future changes
  • Significant upfront costs to update and retrofit the building
  • Unknown conditions and conditions lead to unplanned costs and delays

Design-Build Approach

A design-build approach involves hiring a single contractor to handle both the design and construction of the school.

Pros

  • Streamlined process by combining the design and construction into a single process
  • Single point of responsibility by hiring the same firm for the whole process
  • Improved collaboration between the design and construction teams
  • Cost savings through process optimization and waste reduction

Cons

  • Limited design options
  • Reduced control by the same firm being responsible for the entire process
  • Reduced competition
  • Higher risk to the project if the contractor cannot perform as expected

Ultimately, the most affordable method for building a school will depend on the specific needs and circumstances of the district, and it is important to consider a range of options and factors when making a decision.

At Front Line Advisory Group, we provide program management consulting services for capital improvement bonds. We are revolutionizing the construction industry and transforming client expectations by obsessing over the basics of budget oversight, schedule enforcement, compliance, vendor management, and stakeholder communication. Contact us for more info at info@frontlineadvisorygroup.com.

FLAG provides program management consulting services in Central Texas for municipal and school capital improvement bonds. FLAG is revolutionizing the construction industry and transforming client expectations by obsessing over the basics of budget oversight, schedule enforcement, compliance, vendor management, and stakeholder communication.

Join our weekly newsletter and receive a free copy of our new book!

JOIN NEWSLETTER

Capital Improvement Programs Change Management Planning

Part 2 Leadership in Times of Rapid Expansion: Roles and Responsibilities

Rapid urban expansion is not merely a test of infrastructural resilience but also a reflection of the strength of its...
Read More
Capital Improvement Programs Change Management Planning

Infrastructure 101 Part 1: Anticipating the Needs of Tomorrow

Introduction Cities on the precipice of rapid expansion confront an undeniable reality: the challenges that accompany exponential population growth are...
Read More
Local Planning

Four-Part Series: Staying Ahead of the Curve: Navigating Exponential Population Growth in Cities

In the throes of urban expansion, cities throughout Texas are grappling with the complexities of exponential population growth. Such growth,...
Read More
Bonds Capital Improvement Programs Planning

8 Key Ingredients for a Successful Capital Improvement Bond Program

Capital improvement bond programs are indispensable mechanisms that municipalities, school districts, and other public entities deploy to fund extensive infrastructure...
Read More
Bonds Capital Improvement Programs Planning Process Improvement

How Chesterfield Improved Their Bond Rating & Lessons for Other Local Governments

In the ever-evolving financial landscape of local governments, Chesterfield Township has achieved a commendable feat: a credit rating upgrade. With...
Read More
Capital Improvement Programs Planning PMC Program Management Consultants

How Program Management Consultants Save Money for Local Governments

Introduction Program management consultants play a crucial role in helping local governments save money on capital infrastructure bond programs. These...
Read More
Capital Improvement Programs CIP

The Dual-Edged Sword of Inflation: Navigating Its Impacts on Capital Improvement Bond Programs

In the ever-evolving realm of capital improvement bond programs, inflation emerges as a pivotal factor, wielding a double-edged influence. For...
Read More
Uncategorized

Strategic Separation: The Merits of Distinct Program Management Consultant (PMC) and General Engineering Consultant (GEC) Roles

In capital improvement bond programs, distinctly separating the roles of the Program Management Consultant (PMC) and the General Engineering Consultant...
Read More
Capital Improvement Programs CIP Planning

Strategies to Stay Proactive in Addressing the Four Financial Pillars of Capital Improvement Bond Programs

Capital improvement bond programs serve as pivotal financial mechanisms to propel large-scale projects and vital infrastructure developments forward. At the...
Read More
Capital Improvement Programs CIP Planning

Understanding Capital Infrastructure Bond Programs and Their Scope

A capital infrastructure bond program operates as a paramount financial instrument, frequently utilized by public entities, including municipalities. Its function...
Read More
1 2 3 4 5 6 16