by | Oct 17, 2024 | Articles

Share to:

“Effective regulation should protect consumers and the environment while allowing businesses to thrive.”Christine Lagarde

Many readers may not be aware that Front Line Advisory Group also provides permit oversight and support for local municipalities. One question we frequently receive is: “What are the time and cost impacts on the permitting process for a normal home?”

Here, we explore The Impact of Permitting Costs and Durations on New Home Development and Pricing.

The Cost of Regulation in Home Construction

The construction of new single-family homes is a highly regulated process, with government regulations impacting every phase—from land development to final construction. According to a 2021 study by the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB), government regulations accounted for approximately 23.8% of the final price of a new single-family home. This percentage breaks down into two major categories: 10.5% from regulations imposed during the land development phase and 13.3% from regulations applied during actual construction. This translates to roughly $93,870 for a new home priced at $394,300.

Permitting Costs During Development and Construction

The permitting process significantly contributes to these regulatory costs. During development, developers must obtain zoning approvals, conduct environmental impact assessments, and comply with various local, state, and federal regulations. These processes can be both time-consuming and expensive, adding 6 to 16 months to a project’s timeline.

In the construction phase, builders navigate additional permitting requirements, including building permits, utility hookups, and inspections. On average, 3.1% of the final house price can be directly attributed to fees paid during construction. This includes costs for building permits, inspections, and impact fees, collectively increasing the overall cost of constructing a home.

Time Delays and Their Impact on Costs

Regulatory delays are another significant consequence of the permitting process. Delays during development average around 6 months, while construction delays add another 5 weeks. These delays increase the financial burden on developers and builders due to extended loan interest payments, holding costs, and additional project management expenses. When averaged across all new home projects, these delay costs account for approximately 0.6% of the final home price, or about $1,400 per home.

How Permitting Costs Drive Up Home Prices

The cumulative effect of permitting costs and delays substantially increases the final price of new homes. Regulatory costs associated with permitting, compliance, and delays can add nearly $20,000 to $30,000 to the price of a new home. These costs are often passed on to consumers, contributing to the overall affordability crisis in many housing markets.

Moreover, as regulatory requirements become more stringent over time, the cost burden on builders and developers continues to rise. The NAHB’s 2021 study found that changes to building codes and standards over the past decade have added an average of 6.1% to the cost of constructing a new home. These changes often include stricter energy efficiency standards, safety codes, and architectural design requirements, all of which further complicate the permitting process and increase costs.

Do Developers Disclose Permitting Costs?

Despite the significant impact of permitting on both the cost and timeline of new home construction, developers rarely publish detailed information about the percentage of total costs attributable to the permitting process. This lack of transparency is due to several factors:

  • Competitive Concerns: Developers are often reluctant to disclose their cost structures, as doing so could undermine their negotiating position with subcontractors and suppliers.
  • Complexity of Regulations: The regulatory landscape is highly fragmented, with different rules and requirements at the federal, state, and local levels. Quantifying the exact cost of compliance with each regulation is challenging, making accurate estimates difficult.
  • Lack of Standardization: There is no industry-wide standard for reporting regulatory costs, further complicating efforts to provide consistent data on the impact of permitting.

While industry associations like the NAHB provide aggregate data on regulatory costs, individual developers typically do not disclose specific percentages of total costs attributable to permitting or other regulatory requirements. This opacity makes it difficult for consumers and policymakers to fully understand the cost drivers behind rising home prices.

Conclusion: Addressing the Permitting Challenge

Permitting costs and delays are significant factors driving up the price of new single-family homes. As regulatory requirements become more stringent, these costs will continue to rise, further exacerbating housing affordability challenges. While many regulations are necessary to ensure safety, environmental protection, and community well-being, the permitting process must be streamlined to reduce unnecessary delays and costs.

Policymakers can play a crucial role by simplifying the permitting process and reducing redundant or overly burdensome regulations. By doing so, they can help alleviate some of the cost pressures on developers and builders, ultimately making housing more affordable for consumers. Increased transparency around permitting costs could also foster better communication between developers, builders, and buyers, allowing for more informed decision-making and greater accountability in the homebuilding process.

At Front Line Advisory Group, we manage Capital Improvement programs to ensure they are completed on time and within budget. We make sure every dollar is used wisely to improve our community. For more information or to start your project, contact us at info@frontlineadvisorygroup.com.

 

Citation:

Emrath, P. (2016, May). Government Regulation in the Price of a New Home. Special Study for Housing Economics. National Association of Home Builders.

FLAG provides program management consulting services in Central Texas for municipal and school capital improvement bonds. FLAG is revolutionizing the construction industry and transforming client expectations by obsessing over the basics of budget oversight, schedule enforcement, compliance, vendor management, and stakeholder communication.

Join our weekly newsletter and receive a free copy of our new book!

JOIN NEWSLETTER

3 Things Every Municipality Should Do Before Launching a Bond Program
Articles

3 Things Every Municipality Should Do Before Launching a Bond Program

"Success depends upon previous preparation, and without such preparation there is sure to be failure." — Confucius 3 Things Every...
Read More
Navigating Texas’s Rising Tide of Bond-Funded Capital Improvement Programs
Articles

Navigating Texas’s Rising Tide of Bond-Funded Capital Improvement Programs

"The pessimist complains about the wind; the optimist expects it to change; the realist adjusts the sails." — William Arthur...
Read More
The Infrastructure Whisperers: How Behavioral Economics Can Improve Capital Project Outcomes
Articles

The Infrastructure Whisperers: How Behavioral Economics Can Improve Capital Project Outcomes

In the world of capital improvement programs (CIPs), we obsess over numbers—budgets, schedules, risk matrices. But what if one of...
Read More
Cost Burn Rate Distribution in Large Transportation Infrastructure Projects
Articles

Cost Burn Rate Distribution in Large Transportation Infrastructure Projects

“Time is the scarcest resource, and unless it is managed, nothing else can be managed.” — Peter Drucker Introduction Managing...
Read More
FLAG Reference Guide: Managing Capital Infrastructure Bond Programs
Articles

FLAG Reference Guide: Managing Capital Infrastructure Bond Programs

“You don't build a reputation on what you are going to do.” — Henry Ford Capital infrastructure bond programs are...
Read More
Dashboards: A Critical Control Center for Capital Improvement Program Management
Articles

Dashboards: A Critical Control Center for Capital Improvement Program Management

"Without data, you’re just another person with an opinion." – W. Edwards Deming The Complexity of Modern Capital Programs Managing...
Read More
Infrastructure in Crisis: Why Cities Need Program Management Now More Than Ever
Articles

Infrastructure in Crisis: Why Cities Need Program Management Now More Than Ever

“A society grows great when old men plant trees in whose shade they know they shall never sit.” — Greek...
Read More
Overcoming Optimism and the Uniqueness Trap in Infrastructure Projects
Articles

Overcoming Optimism and the Uniqueness Trap in Infrastructure Projects

Cities routinely invest in roads, libraries, water systems, drainage, and other infrastructure to improve communities. Too often, however, these capital...
Read More
Planned Unit Developments: Investing in Communities
Articles

Planned Unit Developments: Investing in Communities

Planned Unit Developments (PUDs) are popping up in cities and suburbs across the country, promising a mix of homes, shops,...
Read More
U.S. Department of Treasury. Best Practices for Financial Transparency in Public Sector Capital Projects. Retrieved from www.treasury.gov
Articles

U.S. Department of Treasury. Best Practices for Financial Transparency in Public Sector Capital Projects. Retrieved from www.treasury.gov

The Need for Standardized Accounting in Capital Improvement Bond Programs Capital improvement bond programs are the lifeblood of infrastructure development...
Read More
1 2 3 23