Share to:

How Impact Fees Can Benefit Both Businesses and Communities

Many local governments depend upon impact fees as a means of funding infrastructure projects and expanding services that support their communities. These fees are a form of monetary exaction assessed on new developments, such as commercial or residential projects, and are intended to offset the costs of increased demands on public services, such as roads, water, and wastewater systems resulting from economic and population growth. 

Understanding Impact Fees

The State of Texas first implemented legislation authorizing local governments to assess impact fees on new development in 1987.  According to research from the  Texas Demographic Center  the state’s population growth rate of 15.9% is twice that of the nation average, with almost 4 million in added population from 2010-2020.  These population gains place a significant burden on municipalities to provide adequate services and capital improvement programs. Local governments rely on impact fees as a means of funding infrastructure projects and basic services that support thriving communities. Impact fees are an important source of revenue for local governments, but should be structured in a manner that is not overly burdensome on businesses.

The Role of Economic Development in Impact Fee Ordinance Development

Economic development is a critical factor in impact fee determination. Local governments often employ impact fees to encourage job creation and attract new businesses through targeted investment in infrastructure that facilitates access to previously unimproved land, increase the tax base, and improve the overall quality of life for the community.  While low impact fees may attract new businesses, they may also result in a strain on public services and infrastructure traditionally supported predominantly by property tax revenues. Impact fees should be set at a level that sustains development while ensuring the necessary public services are provided.

The Importance of Fairness in Impact Fees

Fairness in impact fee allocation is critical to ensuring new development does not place an undue burden on existing residents and businesses. When impact fees are not allocated fairly, businesses may choose to locate in areas where fees are lower, reducing the competitiveness of the community.

Impact fees should also take into account economic and social equity, not disproportionately impacting low-income communities.  Counties and municipalities can achieve this by offering fee waivers or discounts to affordable housing developers, by using impact fee revenue to fund affordable housing.   Additionally, local governments in the State of Texas may establish Tax Increment Reinvestment Zones (TIRZ)  by city ordinance or county order by earmarking revenues for qualified economic development projects or public improvements.  TIRZ are a Tax Increment Finance (TIF) tool that facilitates up-front commitment to public improvements within areas that are less attractive for investment or may otherwise hinder municipal growth.

Best Practices for Determining Impact Fees

Determining impact fees in a manner that is fair to business while stimulating economic growth and new construction is a complex process that requires a balancing of the needs of the community with those of businesses. Local governments can achieve this equilibrium by involving stakeholders in the process, conducting cost-benefit analyses, using data-driven approaches, and regularly updating impact fees in accordance with Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code. Ultimately, the goal is to encourage economic development while ensuring necessary public services are provided in a fair and equitable manner. By doing so, local governments can promote economic growth, create jobs, and improve the quality of life for everyone in their communities.


Impact fees are an important tool for counties and municipalities to fund the necessary public services and infrastructure associated with new development. Critics will rightly point out that arbitrarily shifting the costs of infrastructure to developers through monetary exactions may discourage growth.  It is with this in mind that determination of impact fees, combined with non-monetary exactions, and the application of TIRZ/TIF are best effected with stakeholder input after due consideration of cost-benefit analysis. Fee scheduling must be transparent and complemented by other financial tools in a manner that is fair to businesses, stimulates economic growth, and reduces burdens upon the taxpayer.

At Front Line Advisory Group, we are providing change management services to help municipalities collect and analyze data, improve stakeholder communication, leverage technology, develop training plans, and more. We believe these are the most effective and affordable ways for municipalities to scale their capabilities. Contact us for more info at

Written by Roy Draa

FLAG provides program management consulting services in Central Texas for municipal and school capital improvement bonds. FLAG is revolutionizing the construction industry and transforming client expectations by obsessing over the basics of budget oversight, schedule enforcement, compliance, vendor management, and stakeholder communication.

Join our weekly newsletter and receive a free copy of our new book!


Bonds Capital Improvement Programs CIP ISD

Unleashing Technological Potential: How Front Line Advisory Group is Changing the Game in Capital Improvement Program Management

On May 6th, 2023 Central Texas cities, counties, and school districts voted to support $4 Billion in infrastructure projects, school...
Read More
Bonds CIP Budgetting Planning

The Texas Bond Review Board: An Essential Steward of the State’s Financial Health

As the Lone Star State's public finance community steers the course of our future, it's vital that we understand the...
Read More
Development Services Planning Process Improvement

Improving Development Permit Approval Times: Cutting Red Tape with Effective Staff Analysis

As municipalities grapple with the new challenges posed by new permitting legislation recently initiated by the state of Texas, managers...
Read More
Capital Improvement Programs CIP CIP Budgetting

Effective Planning: El Paso County’s Consideration of a $200 Million Bond Program

Navigating the intricate dynamics of public infrastructure development often requires a careful blend of foresight, strategy, and community engagement. A...
Read More
Capital Improvement Programs CIP CIP Budgetting

What is a Capital Improvement Program Readiness Audit (CIPRA)

The requirement for a Capital Improvement Program Readiness Audit (CIPRA), while not universally mandated, is of paramount importance to ensure...
Read More
Capital Improvement Programs CIP CIP Budgetting Local

Understanding the Difference Between Critical Path and Driving Path in Project Schedules

Project management involves meticulous planning and scheduling to ensure the successful completion of a project within the allotted time frame....
Read More
Capital Improvement Programs CIP CIP Budgetting

Going Beyond Finance: The Need for Comprehensive Preapproval Processes for Bond Underwriters in High-Growth Municipalities and Independent School Districts

Public finance is an intricate and multi-faceted domain. Its complexity becomes pronounced when we consider the case of bond underwriters...
Read More

Texas: A 5 Year Examination of the Bonds Issued by ISDs and Local Governments

Over the course of the past five years (The period is November 2018 - May 2023), Texas has seen local...
Read More

How to incorporate AI into the Budget Process: A focus on Local Governments

Incorporating artificial intelligence (AI) into the budgeting process in local governments can greatly enhance efficiency, accuracy, and informed decision-making. This...
Read More
Bonds ISD School Bonds

The Changing Landscape of School District Bond Propositions

In the intricate labyrinth of legislation, changes to bond propositions have introduced new complexities for school districts, specifically in how...
Read More
1 4 5 6 7 8 13