Share to:

How Impact Fees Can Benefit Both Businesses and Communities

Many local governments depend upon impact fees as a means of funding infrastructure projects and expanding services that support their communities. These fees are a form of monetary exaction assessed on new developments, such as commercial or residential projects, and are intended to offset the costs of increased demands on public services, such as roads, water, and wastewater systems resulting from economic and population growth. 

Understanding Impact Fees

The State of Texas first implemented legislation authorizing local governments to assess impact fees on new development in 1987.  According to research from the  Texas Demographic Center  the state’s population growth rate of 15.9% is twice that of the nation average, with almost 4 million in added population from 2010-2020.  These population gains place a significant burden on municipalities to provide adequate services and capital improvement programs. Local governments rely on impact fees as a means of funding infrastructure projects and basic services that support thriving communities. Impact fees are an important source of revenue for local governments, but should be structured in a manner that is not overly burdensome on businesses.

The Role of Economic Development in Impact Fee Ordinance Development

Economic development is a critical factor in impact fee determination. Local governments often employ impact fees to encourage job creation and attract new businesses through targeted investment in infrastructure that facilitates access to previously unimproved land, increase the tax base, and improve the overall quality of life for the community.  While low impact fees may attract new businesses, they may also result in a strain on public services and infrastructure traditionally supported predominantly by property tax revenues. Impact fees should be set at a level that sustains development while ensuring the necessary public services are provided.

The Importance of Fairness in Impact Fees

Fairness in impact fee allocation is critical to ensuring new development does not place an undue burden on existing residents and businesses. When impact fees are not allocated fairly, businesses may choose to locate in areas where fees are lower, reducing the competitiveness of the community.

Impact fees should also take into account economic and social equity, not disproportionately impacting low-income communities.  Counties and municipalities can achieve this by offering fee waivers or discounts to affordable housing developers, by using impact fee revenue to fund affordable housing.   Additionally, local governments in the State of Texas may establish Tax Increment Reinvestment Zones (TIRZ)  by city ordinance or county order by earmarking revenues for qualified economic development projects or public improvements.  TIRZ are a Tax Increment Finance (TIF) tool that facilitates up-front commitment to public improvements within areas that are less attractive for investment or may otherwise hinder municipal growth.

Best Practices for Determining Impact Fees

Determining impact fees in a manner that is fair to business while stimulating economic growth and new construction is a complex process that requires a balancing of the needs of the community with those of businesses. Local governments can achieve this equilibrium by involving stakeholders in the process, conducting cost-benefit analyses, using data-driven approaches, and regularly updating impact fees in accordance with Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code. Ultimately, the goal is to encourage economic development while ensuring necessary public services are provided in a fair and equitable manner. By doing so, local governments can promote economic growth, create jobs, and improve the quality of life for everyone in their communities.


Impact fees are an important tool for counties and municipalities to fund the necessary public services and infrastructure associated with new development. Critics will rightly point out that arbitrarily shifting the costs of infrastructure to developers through monetary exactions may discourage growth.  It is with this in mind that determination of impact fees, combined with non-monetary exactions, and the application of TIRZ/TIF are best effected with stakeholder input after due consideration of cost-benefit analysis. Fee scheduling must be transparent and complemented by other financial tools in a manner that is fair to businesses, stimulates economic growth, and reduces burdens upon the taxpayer.

At Front Line Advisory Group, we are providing change management services to help municipalities collect and analyze data, improve stakeholder communication, leverage technology, develop training plans, and more. We believe these are the most effective and affordable ways for municipalities to scale their capabilities. Contact us for more info at

Written by Roy Draa

FLAG provides program management consulting services in Central Texas for municipal and school capital improvement bonds. FLAG is revolutionizing the construction industry and transforming client expectations by obsessing over the basics of budget oversight, schedule enforcement, compliance, vendor management, and stakeholder communication.

Join our weekly newsletter and receive a free copy of our new book!


Articles Uncategorized

Strategic Separation: The Merits of Distinct Program Management Consultant (PMC) and General Engineering Consultant (GEC) Roles

In capital improvement bond programs, distinctly separating the roles of the Program Management Consultant (PMC) and the General Engineering Consultant...
Read More
Articles Capital Improvement Programs CIP Planning

Strategies to Stay Proactive in Addressing the Four Financial Pillars of Capital Improvement Bond Programs

Capital improvement bond programs serve as pivotal financial mechanisms to propel large-scale projects and vital infrastructure developments forward. At the...
Read More
Articles Capital Improvement Programs CIP Planning

Understanding Capital Infrastructure Bond Programs and Their Scope

A capital infrastructure bond program operates as a paramount financial instrument, frequently utilized by public entities, including municipalities. Its function...
Read More
Articles Capital Improvement Programs CIP Planning

Creating a Capital Improvement Bond: A Strategic Guide for Successful Approval

When it comes to establishing a capital improvement bond that stands the best chance of garnering voter approval, it's not...
Read More
Articles Capital Improvement Programs CIP CIP Budgetting Planning Schedule

The Primacy of the Program Master Schedule in a Capital Improvement Bond Program

In the vast expanse of project management, especially in the domain of capital improvement bond programs, there arises a crucial...
Read More
Articles Capital Improvement Programs Planning Process Improvement

The Expansive Role of an Owner’s Representative

An Owner's Representative typically provides a broader range of services than a traditional construction manager, making them invaluable in scenarios...
Read More
Articles Development Services ISD Planning School Bonds

The Critical Questions Every School Board Director Should Ask When Selecting a Program Management Consultant

Selecting the right program management consultant for a school bond construction program is no small feat, especially when it's in...
Read More
Articles Bonds Capital Improvement Programs Planning

Strategic Planning for Capital Infrastructure Bond Packages Amid Economic Challenges

In light of the emerging economic landscape punctuated by escalating interest rates, heightened inflation, and labor and logistical shortages, municipalities...
Read More
Articles Bonds Capital Improvement Programs Planning Process Improvement Schedule

Unraveling the Complexities: A Deeper Examination of Overruns in Capital Infrastructure Bond Projects

Capital infrastructure bonds are pivotal financial instruments for ambitious public projects. However, the recurring theme of these ventures overshooting both...
Read More
Articles Bonds Planning

Navigating a Bond Program through the Maze of a Rising Interest Rate Environment: An Effective Guide

The specter of rising interest rates often casts a long shadow over municipalities, especially when it comes to managing capital...
Read More
1 4 5 6 7 8 17